Friday, May 20, 2011

Tons of food, trillions of bacteria, limitless questions

It’s an oft-repeated phrase among scientists that we know more about the moon than we do our own oceans. The exact same thing could be said about the human digestive system – it’s right under our noses, and yet it’s one of the least-understood organ systems in the body. I mean, in a organism in which everything has a function and space is at a premium, the abdomen contains multiple semi-vestigal organs (the greater omentum, anybody?).

By contrast, most other organs are well understood in their major and minor functions. The kidneys, for example, are a system governed by hydrostatic and osmotic pressures, that then communicate that information to the rest of the body via hormones. Likewise, the heart is a mechanical pump, and not much else.

The gut, however, is a complex interplay of bacteria, enzymes, neurotransmitters, foods, membranes and immune cells. While the cardiovascular system evolved in an effort to move fluid and nutrients around the body, the digestive system was an attempt to tame the wilds of the ocean so that we could harvest nutrients from it. As a result, the digestive system is more like a controlled ecosystem than a mechanical apparatus. After all, there are more bacterial cells in the gut than there are human cells in the rest of the body.

While researchers have a reasonable handle on certain parts of the digestive process, such as enzymatic digestion and absorption, the interplay between food, bacteria, and the immune system is still one of the biggest mysteries in modern science. Research into these relationships will help to answer at lot of questions, such as:

  • What’s the benefit of probiotics? Is it just a question of outcompeting pathogenic bacteria? Why do some studies show benefit even from killed lactobacilli? Who should take what species of probiotics?
  • How do beneficial bacteria interact with the immune system? How do they signal to the immune system? What does the immune system do upon receipt of these signals?
  • How does bacterial digestion affect medications or herbs? Should some people take some over others?
  • What’s the deal with food intolerances? Is it the food itself, or something else that people react to? Does it happen in the bloodstream or in the digestive tract? How can get decent lab tests for food intolerances?
  • And finally, what the heck is IBS, really?

This is about as straightforward as trying to figure out how all of the birds, mammals, insects, bacteria, plants, fungi, viruses, weather patterns, pollution, human activity and magnetic forces in the entire Amazon basin affect one species of tree.

However, an article recently published in Nature has shed some light on one aspect of this question. It appears, based on a small study, that several distinct bacterial ecosystems exist in human digestive tracts. While this doesn’t yet offer explanations to many of the burning clinical questions we have, it represents a massive step forward in mapping the terrain of the digestive system. In the same way that discovering blood type in the early 1900s yielded vital clinical information that saved many lives, in addition to helping to push forward our understanding of the immune system, the discovery of enterotype is likely to yield clinical results and also help elucidate some of the subtleties of the immune system, and how it interacts with food and symbiotic bacteria.

Most surprising, I think, is that the bacterial populations were not organized around Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium or other commonly-studied probiotics. Instead, they were organized around the species Bacteroides, Prevotella and Ruminococcus, names which to date have had little clinical significance. There is also some indication that these bacteria may, and I do mean may, direct the formation of an environment beneficial to certain bacterial strains. More information is likely to come out in the next few years as larger studies are performed – there is already an indication that enterotype 3, centered around Ruminococcus, may include multiple subtypes.

Stay tuned.

Friday, May 13, 2011

An intro to green tea

I’m a huge fan of green tea. I usually start my day with a few cups of a nice, strong brew, which to me are like a life-giving beverage. Not merely an eye-opener, green tea is a restorative that reinvigorates the body with its potent blend of antioxidants, vitamins, and minerals.

Though tea has been a much-beloved beverage the world over for thousands of years, in recent years, green tea in particular has been discovered to have immense health benefits. A PubMed search for ‘Camellia sinensis’, green tea’s Latin name, yields over 1,100 results, while a search for ‘tea’ yields over 16,000 results, making it one of the most heavily researched substances in the naturopathic toolkit. It’s been studied for a variety of conditions, ranging from cancer to weight loss to arthritis. A complete survey of green tea’s documented health effects is far beyond the scope of this blog, so let’s boil it down by saying, ‘Green tea is good for you.’

The majority of the health effects are due to four main constituents: vitamins and minerals, non-vitamin antioxidants, caffeine, and theanine. To help you on your way, here’s a brief explanation of each.

Vitamins and minerals – Green tea is a veritable multivitamin, as it contains carotenoids (some of which your body converts into vitamin A), ascorbic acid (vitamin C), and tocopherols (vitamin E). These all have antioxidant effects and add to green tea’s benefits. Additionally, a variety of minerals are found in tea depending on the soil in which the tea was grown. Selenium and zinc are some of the minerals found in tea, both of which have antioxidant function in the body.

Antioxidants – The antioxidants in tea can generally be categorized as polyphenols, but are sometimes subcategorized as catechins and gallocatechins. Research has show than these polyphenols are directly absorbed into the bloodstream, where they have a variety of actions, including their main function as antioxidants. As an example of their antioxidant activity, they have been shown to prevent oxidation of LDL (‘bad cholesterol’), thus preventing heart disease. In addition to this primary effect, these compounds are antibiotic, antiviral, immune-stimulatory, antimutagenic (they prevent DNA damage, thus preventing cancer), and improve detoxification by the liver. Could you really ask for anything more?

Caffeine – One of the reasons people avoid green tea is due to caffeine. One of the reasons other people embrace green tea is due to the caffeine. In my view, it’s just part of the tea experience, good or bad. Caffeine’s well-known effects include improved sense of alertness, well-being and energy. As a reference point, the caffeine content of a cup of green tea is about 25 mg, a cup of black tea contains 50-60 mg, whereas a cup of coffee contains 150 mg.

Theanine – A little-known amino acid, theanine is found abundantly in green or white tea, but is not present in black tea (it’s destroyed in the fermentation process). Sometimes described as the compound in green tea that generates the ‘zen’ effect, theanine works by increasing the amount of the calming neurotransmitter GABA. As a result, theanine helps to balance the stimulating effect of caffeine, generating that calm uplift for which green tea is known.

Finally, a brief primer on how to brew green or white tea. I brew almost exclusively loose-leaf tea, and rarely brew flavored tea. Tea is generally flavored to hide unpleasant tastes, either in the tea itself, or as a result of poor brewing – good brewing will allow you to explore the universe of teas in their exquisite natural splendor. Like wine, tea comes in endless varietals that range from the elegantly simple greens of Japan, to the flowery oolongs of Taiwan, the spicy chais of India, and the dignified, formal black English breakfast teas. A trip to your local teahouse will find you oohing and ahhing over the varieties available.

The run-down on brewing green tea:

1) Unlike your standard Lipton black breakfast tea, green tea should never be brewed in boiling water. Boil your water, then let it cool for a minute or two before pouring over tea leaves. Water that’s too hot will make your tea bitter – avoid it.

2) Don’t brew your tea too long. Three to four minutes is generally long enough (a few teas are brewed less), after which you should either fully decant your tea from the pot, or remove your brew basket from your mug of tea. Brewing for too long will also make your tea bitter.

3) Brew your tea a second time! Good quality leaves will be able to be brewed at least twice, some a third or even fourth time. For your second brew, increase the brewing time by a minute or so.

4) And a last tip – most green, white or oolong teas should leave a nutty, sweetish taste in the back of your throat. I’m not sure what the source of that sweet taste is, but it’s an indicator that you are brewing correctly.

And that’s it! There are, of course, more elaborate ways of brewing, including timers, digitally-controlled kettles, and elaborate tea pots, but anyone can make a dang good cup of tea with little more than a brew basket as special equipment.

Regular readers of this column will know the value I put on a simple but balanced diet combined with certain superfoods, such as tea. Not to mention the fact that tea connoisseurship will make you one of the more ~refined~ people you know. To your health!

Friday, May 6, 2011

A personal perspective on Death with Dignity laws

At 52, Cody Curtis was diagnosed with cholangiocarcinoma, a cancer affecting the bile ducts of the liver. Soon thereafter, she would undergo a surgical removal of the primary tumor, during which most of her liver was removed as well. Though the surgery was deemed successful, complications ensued, and she was hospitalized for some time afterwards. I remember visiting her while she was in the hospital soon after the surgery – she was clearly in pain and wasn’t fully coherent. I remember thinking how hard it must have been for her husband, Stan, and her children, Jill and Thomas, to have her there, but not really there.

After an extended stay in the hospital, things started looking up – she was in apparent remission, she was upbeat, and she was regaining her strength. I remember visiting a couple of times in that time period. Cody was weak and easily fatigued, as anyone recovering from cancer would be, but was making strides towards health.

This upward movement was not to last, however, as she suffered a recurrence of her liver cancer a year later, and additionally, it had metastasized to her lungs and lymph nodes. At that point, her doctors said that there was nothing more that they could do.

A resident of Portland, Oregon, Cody decided to take advantage of the ‘Death with Dignity’ law that has been on the books since 1994. Death from cholangiocarcinoma is not pretty. It’s slow, it’s painful and it’s degrading. Having already been through so much pain and suffering, and having seen the toll that it took on her family, she decided to ask her physician for a lethal prescription.

In 2008, Washington state passed Death with Dignity legislation. When it had first appeared, I was in favor of it. After all, it was only humane. My own mother had passed away after a protracted battle with ovarian cancer that became uglier as time went on, and I felt others should be allowed to decide to avoid that.

However, when I reached the voting booth, I faltered. I found myself thinking of loved ones and couldn’t decide what I would do when placed in that situation. Faced with a terminal diagnosis, could I ask my physician for a lethal prescription, or support someone doing the same? I abstained. I wouldn’t mark no, but I couldn’t mark the yes box. I left the voting booth with an empty space on my ballot.

Cody changed that, and I can now honestly say that I am fully in support of Death with Dignity laws. Most of us would probably want to go quietly in our sleep if we could, but that is not a luxury afforded to those with terminal illnesses. Adding to the already difficult process of getting affairs in order, preparing to leave family members, and coming to terms with mortality, there is an element of fear that pervades life. Fear of painful symptoms, fear of hospital visits, fear of the suffering your family will go through. Additionally, there is treatment. Remarkable as it is to say, though treatment for the dying can provide some comfort, it also prolongs the agony, and adds to the fears and stresses. I can speak to that myself; a dying person is in and out of hospitals in their final months, they have symptoms, they eat more medication than food, they have side effects and they have pain.

Additionally, there is the subject of coherence. Late stage diseases are often terribly painful, and are heavily treated with pain-killing medications. While a patient may not be in pain, their ability to think, speak, and interact is heavily impaired. A drawn out, terminal illness allows the time to have family and friends visit and say goodbye, but sometimes that comes at the price of knowing they are there.

Having the lethal prescription available freed Cody from the fear of what would be come of her and her family. Taking charge of how and when she would die allowed her to focus on the most important things in life. She spent time with her husband and children. She went walking in the park on those rare, but beautiful, sunny days in Portland. She cooked a delicious and lavish last Thanksgiving dinner (I was there – it was fantastic). She was free to truly savor her remaining time on earth and do so knowing that when her illness became overwhelming she didn’t have to put herself or her family through it. She knew that suffering wasn’t in her future. Somewhat ironically, she was filled with an optimism that many people in the prime of life don’t have.

She passed away peacefully in December of 2009, surrounded by her family. It had not been an easy path to tread, but I know her husband and children wouldn’t have had it any other way. In a culture where death is feared and hidden, Cody both lived and died with a grace and dignity that should serve as an example. Her story is both somber and inspirational, and I consider it an honor to have known her.

This year, the Grand Jury Prize for a Documentary film at the prestigious Sundance Film Festival went to the film How to Die in Oregon, which follows Cody through those final months of her life. It is currently being shown at film festivals around the country, and will be premiering on HBO at the end of the month. I have not had the opportunity to view the film, but the reviews say that it is a beautiful, though challenging, film. I urge you all to mark your calendars and tune in.

Friday, April 29, 2011

More on the future of healthcare: a tale of quantity and quality


American healthcare is changing at the moment, and is doing so rapidly. As I’ve highlighted in the past, the way that we pay for healthcare is changing at the moment, and will continue to change until a more sustainable model is found. The rise of integrative medicine is an irreversible trend, and I predict that in the future, primary care physicians will move away from pharmaceuticals, embracing instead diet and lifestyle, simple home remedies, and many will incorporate supplements too. Additionally, and without trying to play the role of soothsayer, I predict that in the future, we will see a greater effort to integrate the occasionally opposed principles of quality and quantity.

The development of scientific method, from the 17th century through the 20th, has brought many things to the field of medicine. Modern diagnostics, labwork, imaging, and pharmaceuticals are only the tip of the iceberg. Diseases have been essentially eradicated, debilitating illnesses cured, and lives saved. This blog entry is by no means meant to diminish the work of the generations of doctors and researchers who have taken us so far. Even so, we are now starting to see some of the limitations of our current use of scientific method.

These limitations are dictated by an essential feature of the scientific method – the need for quantification. Science runs on experiments and reproducibility, the ability to observe measurable changes, and be able to communicate them to colleagues. To do that, everything needs to be quantified, from milligrams of a drug, to cholesterol levels, to changes in waist circumference. Ironically, even quality of life has been quantified so that the effect of pharmaceuticals can be measured.

Unfortunately, quantity of health doesn’t always equate to quality of health, and in some cases, quality of health is sacrificed in favor of quantifiable measures. Pharmaceuticals and surgeries can regulate your cholesterol, blood sugar, weight, and blood pressure, but that combination doesn’t make a healthy person – it makes a person who is statistically less likely to suffer a cardiovascular event. By no means am I saying that this is somehow bad – as a doctor, I work every day with patients to reduce the likelihood that they’ll suffer a heart attack or stroke. What I am saying, however, is that health is a complex mix of quality and quantity that needs a better system of assessment.

Quality is traditionally trickier to work with. For one, it requires more time to assess. Also, training physicians who are able to assess and determine quality is far more complicated than training physicians who can assess quantity – the one involves an ability to understand and interpret the human condition, the other the ability to read a lab report. True primary care physicians should have the ability to assess health in its fullest scope, and should be trained to do so.

Next week, I’ll discuss the growing Death with Dignity movement in greater detail, but suffice it to say that this is a case study for the debate on quality vs quantity. The life of a terminally ill patient can be prolonged far beyond what nature alone would allow, but often at the price of quality of life. The Death with Dignity movement attempts to reconcile those two opposing principles for the terminally ill. While this branch of the debate on quality vs quantity is sometimes dramatic, many more Americans quietly wrestle with quality and quantity in their everyday lives. Such people include those Americans who struggle with chronic diseases, some of whom feel the cures are often worse than the disease.

As healthcare changes in the future, let’s commit ourselves to a future where both quality and quantity are both taken into account. This is the core principle of patient-based medicine. One of my guiding principles in patient care comes from my teacher and mentor, Dr. Maryanne Ivons, who paraphrased Dr. Samuel Hahnemann in saying, “It’s not about you. It’s all about the patient. It’s about what they want, and getting them healthy.”

Friday, April 22, 2011

The healthiest recipe I know

When it comes to food, I’m a traditionalist. I tend to go for more tried and true foods when I cook, foods that our ancestors enjoyed and passed down. Thus, while I enjoy colcannon, a British standard that can include kale, cabbage, or any number of other cruciferous veggies, I tend to avoid odd combinations of quinoa, kale and tofu. Our ancestors cooked based on taste, and since then, we’ve learned that these foods were healthy – in modern times, people sometimes go the other direction, from healthy to tasty, which produces some strange culinary results. Here’s a great recipe that’s delicious, and is probably the single healthiest recipe I know.

This recipe comes from Claudia Roden’s excellent cookbook, The New Book of Middle Eastern Cooking, which is chock-full of excellent recipes that are healthy nearly across the board. Muhammara comes to us from the cooking tradition of Syria and Turkey, and combines four foods which science has since proven to be ‘superfoods’, foods with extremely high nutritional value. Multiple recipes for muhammara exist, ranging from spicy red pepper dips, to this, a tangy pomegranate/walnut dip.

One of the great superfoods, walnuts are rich in omega-3 fatty acids, specifically ALA (alpha-linolenic acid), which is one of the healthiest, but hardest to find compounds in nature. The search for vegetarian-source omega-3 fatty acids has driven people to some sources not traditionally viewed as food. As I’ve discussed in blog post upon blog post, omega-3 fats are extremely healthy, decreasing inflammation and promoting cardiovascular health. The humble walnut is an understated, but uniquely healthy food.

Tomatoes are near ubiquitous in American food, but are often eaten as colorless, warehouse-ripened fruits, with no more nutrition content than iceberg lettuce. Vine-ripened tomatoes, especially in the form of tomato paste, are rich in a variety of carotenoids, specifically the much-lauded lycopene. Lycopene is a potent antioxidant that has shown some benefit for a variety of conditions, including several types of cancer (including prostate cancer) and cardiovascular conditions.

Olive oil, a staple of the Mediterranean diet, is featured here as well. Olive oil’s main role in a healthy diet is as a healthy alternative to butter, due to its healthier fat profile. Olive oil is rich in unsaturated fats, as opposed to butter’s inflammation-producing saturated fats. Additionally, there is some evidence that the antioxidants in olive oil may provide some of it’s beneficial effects on cardiovascular health.

Finally, we come to that all-important, antioxidant-rich powerhouse, pomegranate. Pomegranate is full of vitamin C, a well-known antioxidant, but also a number of other antioxidants, like ellagic acid, anthocyanidins, and catechins. A food revered across the world since ancient times, pomegranate is mentioned in the Bible, the Qu’ran, and the Homeric Hymns.

Put these all together, and you’ve got a potent blend of antioxidants and anti-inflammatory unsaturated fats. This really is a massively healthy recipe, although I know I’ll get some flack from the gluten-intolerant – just leave the bread out!

Ok, here’s the recipe:

1 ¼ cups of chopped walnuts
1 ½ - 2 tablespoons of tomato paste (see note below)
Bread crumbs from one slice of bread, crust removed, lightly toasted
½ cup of olive oil
2 tablespoons pomegranate concentrate (also called syrup or molasses)
1 tsp red pepper flakes, or a pinch of cayenne
1 teaspoon cumin
Salt to taste

Combine the ingredients in a food processor and blend to a coarse grind.

This is very enjoyable on its own with pita, or as a condiment for traditional foods like kefta, fish, or other meats.

There are a number of pomegranate concentrates out there, with varying flavors –as a result, the recipe can vary in taste significantly, from tangy and sweet to mild and tomato-y. You may have to go to ethnic markets to find pomegranate concentrate, depending on where you live. Additionally, pomegranate concentrates made by health supplement companies are often very different than those made by ethnic food companies - just so you're aware of it!

Hope you enjoy this delectable dish, which has become a favorite of mine.

Note: Thanks to my friend Darren for pointing out to use tomato paste packaged in glass, rather than cans, unless the cans are specifically labelled that they aren't lined with BPA (bisphenol A). BPA is about as nasty as a compound can get, and the acids in tomato products leech it from the can lining into the food itself. Maybe I should post about this in the future. . .

Friday, April 8, 2011

Allergy season starts again

Last year, a friend of mine wrote to me looking for advice about his seasonal allergies. As soon as spring started to take hold in Massachusetts, he’d be sneezing and stuffed up, and would remain so for months. For years, he’d been taking Claritin and Zyrtec but wanted to cut back on them, going instead for a more natural approach. I made some recommendations, and he was able to cut his usage back to about 25% of what it had been previously! He emailed me last week to let me know about his continued success, and is looking to see how much more he can do this year… Maybe even go off the meds altogether. We’ll see how it goes, but it got me to thinking that I probably ought to write about natural approaches to allergies.

The first line of defense when it comes to allergies for most naturopathic doctors are vitamin C. Simple and unassuming, sometimes overlooked, vitamin C packs a punch against seasonal allergies. The exact mechanism is as yet unknown, although it appears as though it helps to block histamine release, as well as improving the breakdown of histamine once it is released. Dosing with vitamin C is variable, but 1-2 grams per day is an average dose. During acute flares, some patients take higher dosages, but this should only be pursued while under the supervision of a doctor, as there can be some side effects – loose stool and abdominal cramping being the primary one.

Quercetin comes next on the list, and for similar reasons – it’s a mast cell stabilizer that prevents those cells from releasing of histamine. Dosage is lower than the vitamin C dosage, and quercetin doesn’t generally come with any abdominal symptoms. Try going for around 500-1000 mg per day. In my experience, this does not have as strong an immediate effect as vitamin C, but can bring great results if used for long-term maintenance and prevention of seasonal allergies. Quercetin is often available in products along with vitamin C, making it easy to get these nutrients together. The friend I mentioned above used what is often called a ‘QBC’ product, meaning that it contains quercetin, bromelain and vitamin C. Bromelain is used in these products because it is an anti-inflammatory enzyme – when taken on an empty stomach, it enters the bloodstream and helps break down inflammation-producing molecules.

There is some question about the exact mechanism by which quercetin acts in allergies, as it is absorbed poorly in the gut, but nonetheless, it’s used clinically with great success. In vitro research has clearly shown that it acts directly on mast cells with great efficacy, leading a teacher of mine to suggest that its actual mode of action is calming the immune response in the gut, thus indirectly calming the systemic immune system.

It seems that people can’t get enough of probiotics lately, and allergies are no exception. Several studies have emerged recently that indicate that various preparations of probiotics help to relieve allergy symptoms. The exact mechanism is as yet unclear, but it has been suggested that the positive effect may come from actually influencing the immune system to shift the type of immune cells it produces – a shift from Th2 cells to Th1 cells, a shift associated with a less allergic immune response.

One issue in the use of probiotics that hasn’t been fully answered is the question of what strains to use. Clinical trials of probiotics always use specific strains of probiotics, because such is the nature of clinical trials – in order to meet the standards of clinical trials and facilitate reproducibility, researchers need to note exactly what species and strain was used to generate the results. Unfortunately, this doesn’t always translate to what is available to consumers! Here’s the good news, however – other research states that non-allergic people have higher levels of beneficial bacteria in their digestive tracts across the board, not just one or two strains. This means that probiotics of various types may offer benefit to those with allergies, so as long as you are buying from a reputable brand, you are in the clear.

Fish oils are sometimes used by clinicians for allergies, and although the research isn’t as strong, the reasoning is straightforward. As I’ve stated in previous columns, unsaturated fats, like those found in fish oil, are used by the body to produce anti-inflammatory compounds. This is in contrast to saturated fats, which are used to produce inflammatory versions of those same compounds. The logic says that by reducing saturated fats and increasing unsaturated fats, you shift the body towards a non-inflammatory state. Fish oils are a good idea for almost everyone anyway, and while the research isn’t specifically there for allergies, I recommend this as a general health measure.

And finally, for those of you who thought you could get away this allergy season by just taking vitamins, here’s the part where I say you should eat veggies and exercise. So there it is. Eat veggies and exercise. End of story.

Actually, it’s not the end of the story, but everything I’ve already said will be repeated here in this section. Less fatty meat and more fish will shift your body towards a less inflammatory state. Yogurt, sauerkraut, and other fermented foods contain live probiotics that can help promote healthy gut flora. Remember that veggies are chock full of vitamin C and bioflavinoids (like quercetin), which help to block the release of histamine, and the other antioxidants and minerals may help out as well.

I also want to make sure that I recommend drinking plenty of water and exercising. Part of the problem with allergic symptoms is water balance. Some folks have thick mucus that blocks their nasal passages, others have profuse flowing snot – either way, it’s a question of balance. By consuming water regularly and sweating it out, you help train your body to regulate the flow of water, not to mention helping to keep a steady flow of inflammatory compounds out of the body. There is, of course, no research showing this to be true, but I but I think it’s sound judgment. Let’s be honest, drinking water and exercising are helpful anyway, so get out there and get moving!

Long as this list might seem, it can actually be broken down into a fairly straightforward regimen. Eating vegetables and drinking plenty of water is the basis for any healthy regimen, as is moderating the amount of saturated fat you eat, and increasing unsaturated fat. Beyond that, make sure you get enough vitamin C and bioflavinoids (like quercetin) – in high doses like the ones listed above, they can really shut down the allergic cascade. Finally, probiotics seem to help just about everything, and the research is clearly there on allergies, so make sure you get those little guys in every day. Most importantly, all of these recommendations help prevent allergies in different ways, which means they won’t interact with one another, and will have an additive effect by shutting down your allergies in multiple locations.

And remember: the earlier the better – the more you can do to get your allergies under control now, before they start, the better. An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.

Monday, April 4, 2011

A ringing endorsement of the Mediterranean Diet

Diets are a dime-a-dozen in America, and most will make elaborate claims for their effectiveness, ranging from losing a few pounds, to losing all of your body fat, growing an inch or two, and marrying the celebrity of your choice. Few deliver on these claims, and fewer still come with rules that are easy to follow. Many also focus on weight loss as their sole purpose, without regard to the effect of the diet on the rest of the body – the Atkins Diet is the classic example. In contrast to most diets, the Mediterranean diet is fairly simple to follow, has strong research behind it, and promotes healthy weight without sacrificing the rest of the body. I advocate eating in accordance with a Mediterranean diet even for those not seeking to lose weight, as I believe it to be one of the best diet plans currently known.

One of the things that makes it so easy is that it focuses on food, rather than numbers. What I mean is that when you sit down to eat, instead of counting calories, fat content, sugar content, or whatever, you decide based on the food itself. Thus, rather than pulling out a calculator and saying, ‘Ok, if I get the salad minus the dressing, and the pasta dish, but not the one with the cream sauce, and a non-fat latte, that will be the right amount of calories,’ you would instead say to yourself, ‘Ok, Salmon and Kale – salmon has omega-3s and protein, kale has fiber, vitamins and minerals. Good choice, I’m going to enjoy this.’ Focusing on what foods offer, rather than avoiding ‘bad stuff,’ is easier to do, and a healthier way to interact with food. Additionally, being in a positive state of mind while eating and being happy about the food you are eating, rather than fearful that it will make you fat or unhealthy, allows you to enter a parasympathetic state while you are eating, improving your digestion and helping you make the best of your meal’s nutrients.

Ok, the nuts and bolts... Here’s what you should eat the most of: olive oil or other unsaturated fats, fruits, vegetables, unprocessed grains, legumes and fish. Consume moderate amounts of eggs, dairy and wine, and low amounts of red meat. The resulting diet is high in fiber, high in unsaturated fat, high in antioxidants, low in sugar and low in saturated fat. The additional rule is that this should be accompanied by regular physical exercise – remember that before supermarkets, if you didn’t work, you didn’t eat!

The unwritten rule to the Mediterranean diet, which I feel is at least partially responsible for the diet’s beneficial properties, is to eat whole foods, and cook for yourself. These two rules go hand in hand as part of a diet plan. Based as it is on a traditional diet, the Mediterranean diet emphasizes food in its natural form, not in a processed, manufactured form. The health upshot of this is that by eating fewer processed foods you consume less saturated fat (and trans-fat) and less sugar, which are used to prolong the shelf-life of foods.

The research is very strongly in favor of the Mediterranean diet. The first data to support the efficacy of Mediterranean eating patterns came from the Seven Countries Study, which showed that deaths from heart disease in Southern European populations were lower than Northern Europeans and North Americans. Since then, many large studies have shown added benefits to a Mediterranean style of eating, including lower rates of depressionType II diabetes (non-insulin dependent diabetes), obesity, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia,  and all-cause mortality. The message here is that the Mediterranean diet promotes a healthy weight, as well as dramatically improved cardiovascular health.

One of the reasons that I believe the Mediterranean diet to be especially beneficial and easy to follow is that it is modeled on how people actually eat, coming from traditional eating patterns in coastal Greece, Italy, Spain and Morocco. Many diets are based on scientific research into nutrition and biochemistry, and try to target one macronutrient as the cause of weight gain or ill health – low fat, low carb, etc. diets fall into this category. The Mediterranean diet is based on a diet that has proven healthy for millions of people for generations. As a result, it takes into account a healthy balance of macronutrients, combined with vitamins and minerals. Additionally, and importantly, the diet is an enjoyable one, for after all, people wouldn’t have been eating this way if it didn’t make them both healthy and happy. So get out there, get some exercise, then come home and cook up a healthy meal, and above all, have a blast doing it – your heart and waistline will thank you.